Skip to content

Conversation

durran
Copy link
Member

@durran durran commented Feb 1, 2022

Description

Sets the driver to use the proper CANONICALIZE_HOST_NAME option when using Kerberos.

What is changing?

Removes the old check of gssapiCanonicalizeHostName to use the proper option. This was dead code as it was not a public member of our AuthMechanismProperties and was not parsed by the URI.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

No

What is the motivation for this change?

NODE-3351

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: <type>(NODE-xxxx)<!>: <description>
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

Copy link
Contributor

@dariakp dariakp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple minor things here

@dariakp dariakp added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Feb 3, 2022
@durran durran requested a review from dariakp February 4, 2022 13:07
dariakp
dariakp previously approved these changes Feb 7, 2022
@dariakp dariakp added Team Review Needs review from team and removed Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes labels Feb 7, 2022
@durran durran requested a review from nbbeeken February 8, 2022 14:35
nbbeeken
nbbeeken previously approved these changes Feb 8, 2022
@durran durran changed the title fix(NODE-3351): use hostname canonicalization feat(NODE-3351): use hostname canonicalization Feb 8, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@dariakp dariakp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@dariakp dariakp merged commit f5c76f3 into main Feb 8, 2022
@dariakp dariakp deleted the NODE-3351 branch February 8, 2022 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Team Review Needs review from team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants